TRAINING
Slow site activation is predictable — when the signals are visible
Slow site activation, incomplete staff training, and protocol misunderstanding follow patterns you can see in the data. PING makes those patterns visible and actionable, so study teams close readiness gaps before recruitment opens.
Site readiness problems PING solves
Site Activation
Sites are activated on paper, but the staff are not trained and recruitment never starts.
PING monitors training completion at every site and flags the ones where staff readiness is lagging. Teams see which sites are stalling and get recommendations to close the gaps before the enrollment window opens.
Training Completeness
Required training is incomplete or expired, and no one catches it until an audit.
PING tracks every required course and certification across the study team continuously. When a staff member's GCP or protocol training lapses, PING flags it with enough lead time to fix it before it becomes an inspection finding.
Protocol Competency
Staff finished the training but misread the eligibility criteria, so screen failures pile up.
PING looks past completion to comprehension. When assessment results reveal weak spots, PING raises a signal before those gaps turn into screen failures and protocol deviations.
Training Impact
Retraining happens, but no one knows whether it worked.
PING tracks the impact of every training intervention. When a site completes a refresher, PING measures whether its readiness and screening performance improved. The loop between training and outcome is closed.
Who PING Serves
Built for study teams across every trial type
New Site Activations
Readiness tracking for sites coming online for the first time.
Multi-Site Trials
Training oversight across a large site footprint, in one view.
Decentralized & Hybrid Trials
Staff readiness for remote and distributed teams.
Academic & Investigator-Initiated Studies
Training support for leaner teams with less infrastructure.
Ready to see site readiness in real time?
Everything you need to know
Training completion at every site, required courses and certifications such as GCP and protocol training, how well staff understood the material, and whether retraining worked.
It monitors training completion at every site and flags those where staff readiness is lagging, with recommendations to close the gaps before the enrollment window opens.
Yes. PING tracks every required course and certification and flags a lapse with enough lead time to fix it before it becomes an inspection finding.
Not always. PING looks past completion to comprehension. When assessment results reveal weak spots, it raises a signal before they turn into screen failures and protocol deviations.
PING measures the impact of every training intervention. When a site completes a refresher, you see whether its readiness and screening performance improved.
New site activations, multi-site trials, decentralized and hybrid trials, and academic and investigator-initiated studies.
Let's talk about your data and programs
Tell us a little about your organization and goals. Our team will reach out to show how PING and Master Table can help turn your data into actionable insights.